Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)


Post Reply 
Rutgers
Author Message
Bookmark and Share
Franko Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,786
Joined: Mar 2009
Reputation: 29
I Root For: WKU
Location: Louisville, Ky
Post: #1
Exclamation Rutgers
I don't think they deserve to go bowling when you look at their season.
1. A .500 record 6 & 6
2. Lost 5 of their last 7 games.
3. Didn't beat anyone with a winning record.
4. Failed to score more than 20 points in last 7 games.
.
They did play a tougher schedule than most SBC teams but still any way you spin it it is not bowl worthy. They did meet the minimum requirement but I bet any of 7 SBC teams could of beat them this season.
12-08-2013 11:27 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


UofMemphis Away
Official MT.org Ambassador of Smack
*

Posts: 45,853
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation: 851
I Root For: Univ of Memphis
Location: Bartlett, TN

Donators
Post: #2
RE: Rutgers
AAC has a contract...so opinion does not factor into it...that's why it's nice to be in a conference with a nice bowl set up.
12-08-2013 03:41 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Usajags Offline
Sun Belt Nationalist
*

Posts: 6,101
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation: 102
I Root For: South Alabama
Location: Jaguar Nation
Post: #3
RE: Rutgers
This is why they need to set the rule that all 7-5 teams must be used before using 6-6 teams.
12-08-2013 03:43 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


Franko Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,786
Joined: Mar 2009
Reputation: 29
I Root For: WKU
Location: Louisville, Ky
Post: #4
RE: Rutgers
(12-08-2013 03:41 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  AAC has a contract...so opinion does not factor into it...that's why it's nice to be in a conference with a nice bowl set up.
.
I know, but still I think it's not fair. 01-lauramac2
12-08-2013 04:23 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
galojah Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 2,305
Joined: Aug 2003
Reputation: 36
I Root For: WKU & NC State
Location: Raleigh, NC

Donators
Post: #5
RE: Rutgers
Amazing how contracts hold up everywhere else, but are just guidelines in the SBC.
12-08-2013 04:27 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
chiefsfan Online
No Seriously, they let me be a mod
*

Posts: 36,270
Joined: Sep 2007
Reputation: 438
I Root For: ASU
Location:
Post: #6
RE: Rutgers
(12-08-2013 04:27 PM)galojah Wrote:  Amazing how contracts hold up everywhere else, but are just guidelines in the SBC.


It is funny.

Though had we enforced the contract in the SBC, Bowls would have turned out the same.
12-08-2013 07:52 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2020 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2020 MyBB Group.