CSNbbs
Mandatory Visors - Printable Version

+- CSNbbs (https://csnbbs.com)
+-- Forum: Active Boards (/forum-769.html)
+--- Forum: Lounge (/forum-564.html)
+---- Forum: The Sports Bar (/forum-531.html)
+----- Forum: Pro Sports (/forum-516.html)
+----- Thread: Mandatory Visors (/thread-219871.html)



- T-Monay820 - 12-17-2003 10:47 PM

"Pro-Choice" - Hampers vision, right to choose equipment, and uncomfortable, doesn't conform to "macho-man" code.

"Pro-Visor" - proven reduction in injuries

I vote yes. Going out with a preventable eye injury is just plain ridiculous. Thats like making shoes optional for basketball. "They're uncomfortable!"


- cbfranchise3 - 12-18-2003 10:48 AM

It would be bad for hockey marketing, another barrier between face and camera.


- T-Monay820 - 12-18-2003 12:13 PM

cbfranchise3 Wrote:It would be bad for hockey marketing, another barrier between face and camera.
Visors are clear.


- cbfranchise3 - 12-18-2003 05:56 PM

Still a physical barrier.


- tysramm1 - 12-18-2003 06:15 PM

if someone wants to risk a pretty important part of their body, the eye, to see better, then its their choice