Woot! Iraqis may be able to do something by next year!
Sarahbelle18 Wrote:Woot! Iraqis may be able to do something by next year!
just as expected.
What's that phrase Bush taught me?
"There's an old saying in Tennessee
[quote="Sarahbelle18"]What's that phrase Bush taught me?
"There's an old saying in Tennessee
[quote="dfarr"][quote="Sarahbelle18"]What's that phrase Bush taught me?
"There's an old saying in Tennessee
[quote="Sarahbelle18"][quote="dfarr"][quote="Sarahbelle18"]What's that phrase Bush taught me?
"There's an old saying in Tennessee
Well, the point is, the public has been fed a lot of wrong information and far-fetched notions about this war.
From "we will be greeted as liberators", to "the insurgency is in its last throes", to General Franks saying that we would have just 30000 troops on the ground by the end of 2003...and the list goes on. It's now 2006 and we have 130,000 troops on the ground, 2300 soldiers dead, and a over 17000 injured. Would I like to the Iraqi forces strong enough to protect the volatile ares? Of course I would. Am I putting a lot of faith into this actually happening in the near future? No, not really. I've been fooled too many times to believe it before I actually see it happen.
Sarahbelle18 Wrote:Well, the point is, the public has been fed a lot of wrong information and far-fetched notions about this war.
From "we will be greeted as liberators", to "the insurgency is in its last throes", to General Franks saying that we would have just 30000 troops on the ground by the end of 2003...and the list goes on. It's now 2006 and we have 130,000 troops on the ground, 2300 soldiers dead, and a over 17000 injured. Would I like to the Iraqi forces strong enough to protect the volatile ares? Of course I would. Am I putting a lot of faith into this actually happening in the near future? No, not really. I've been fooled too many times to believe it before I actually see it happen.
yeah, and iraq is on the brink of civil war, nobody wants us there, and our soldiers terrorize women and children in the middle of the night.
dfarr Wrote:Sarahbelle18 Wrote:Well, the point is, the public has been fed a lot of wrong information and far-fetched notions about this war.
From "we will be greeted as liberators", to "the insurgency is in its last throes", to General Franks saying that we would have just 30000 troops on the ground by the end of 2003...and the list goes on. It's now 2006 and we have 130,000 troops on the ground, 2300 soldiers dead, and a over 17000 injured. Would I like to the Iraqi forces strong enough to protect the volatile ares? Of course I would. Am I putting a lot of faith into this actually happening in the near future? No, not really. I've been fooled too many times to believe it before I actually see it happen.
yeah, and iraq is on the brink of civil war, nobody wants us there, and our soldiers terrorize women and children in the middle of the night.
and your point is?
Sarahbelle18 Wrote:dfarr Wrote:Sarahbelle18 Wrote:Well, the point is, the public has been fed a lot of wrong information and far-fetched notions about this war.
From "we will be greeted as liberators", to "the insurgency is in its last throes", to General Franks saying that we would have just 30000 troops on the ground by the end of 2003...and the list goes on. It's now 2006 and we have 130,000 troops on the ground, 2300 soldiers dead, and a over 17000 injured. Would I like to the Iraqi forces strong enough to protect the volatile ares? Of course I would. Am I putting a lot of faith into this actually happening in the near future? No, not really. I've been fooled too many times to believe it before I actually see it happen.
yeah, and iraq is on the brink of civil war, nobody wants us there, and our soldiers terrorize women and children in the middle of the night.
and your point is?
that there has been a lot more false badnews than good news.
dfarr Wrote:Sarahbelle18 Wrote:dfarr Wrote:Sarahbelle18 Wrote:Well, the point is, the public has been fed a lot of wrong information and far-fetched notions about this war.
From "we will be greeted as liberators", to "the insurgency is in its last throes", to General Franks saying that we would have just 30000 troops on the ground by the end of 2003...and the list goes on. It's now 2006 and we have 130,000 troops on the ground, 2300 soldiers dead, and a over 17000 injured. Would I like to the Iraqi forces strong enough to protect the volatile ares? Of course I would. Am I putting a lot of faith into this actually happening in the near future? No, not really. I've been fooled too many times to believe it before I actually see it happen.
yeah, and iraq is on the brink of civil war, nobody wants us there, and our soldiers terrorize women and children in the middle of the night.
and your point is?
that there has been a lot more false badnews than good news.
So youre saying that the increase of secretarian violence couldnt lead to Civil War?
Nobody wants us there? I wouldnt say nobody, but the majority doesnt according to Zoghby polls.
Im not touching the terrorizing women, refer to the other thread for that.
Sarahbelle18 Wrote:dfarr Wrote:Sarahbelle18 Wrote:dfarr Wrote:Sarahbelle18 Wrote:Well, the point is, the public has been fed a lot of wrong information and far-fetched notions about this war.
From "we will be greeted as liberators", to "the insurgency is in its last throes", to General Franks saying that we would have just 30000 troops on the ground by the end of 2003...and the list goes on. It's now 2006 and we have 130,000 troops on the ground, 2300 soldiers dead, and a over 17000 injured. Would I like to the Iraqi forces strong enough to protect the volatile ares? Of course I would. Am I putting a lot of faith into this actually happening in the near future? No, not really. I've been fooled too many times to believe it before I actually see it happen.
yeah, and iraq is on the brink of civil war, nobody wants us there, and our soldiers terrorize women and children in the middle of the night.
and your point is?
that there has been a lot more false badnews than good news.
So youre saying that the increase of secretarian violence couldnt lead to Civil War?
Nobody wants us there? I wouldnt say nobody, but the majority doesnt according to Zoghby polls.
Im not touching the terrorizing women, refer to the other thread for that.
of course it COULD, but it hasnt. all the major political/religious leaders helped calm the tensions after the golden dome was blown up.
oh, zogby? the same guy that said that kerry was ahead by 10 points? the very same zogby who's on the executive committee of the democratic national party? yeah, he's not biased.
yeah, i'd stay away from terrorizing women too, since according to the latest dem presidential nominee we are. but we love the military!!
dfarr Wrote:Sarahbelle18 Wrote:dfarr Wrote:Sarahbelle18 Wrote:dfarr Wrote:Sarahbelle18 Wrote:Well, the point is, the public has been fed a lot of wrong information and far-fetched notions about this war.
From "we will be greeted as liberators", to "the insurgency is in its last throes", to General Franks saying that we would have just 30000 troops on the ground by the end of 2003...and the list goes on. It's now 2006 and we have 130,000 troops on the ground, 2300 soldiers dead, and a over 17000 injured. Would I like to the Iraqi forces strong enough to protect the volatile ares? Of course I would. Am I putting a lot of faith into this actually happening in the near future? No, not really. I've been fooled too many times to believe it before I actually see it happen.
yeah, and iraq is on the brink of civil war, nobody wants us there, and our soldiers terrorize women and children in the middle of the night.
and your point is?
that there has been a lot more false badnews than good news.
So youre saying that the increase of secretarian violence couldnt lead to Civil War?
Nobody wants us there? I wouldnt say nobody, but the majority doesnt according to Zoghby polls.
Im not touching the terrorizing women, refer to the other thread for that.
of course it COULD, but it hasnt. all the major political/religious leaders helped calm the tensions after the golden dome was blown up.
oh, zogby? the same guy that said that kerry was ahead by 10 points? the very same zogby who's on the executive committee of the democratic national party? yeah, he's not biased.
yeah, i'd stay away from terrorizing women too, since according to the latest dem presidential nominee we are. but we love the military!!
Did they all hold hands and sing "kumbaya" too?
You may want to read the news, dfarr:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/con...00110.html
things arent looking so hot over there.
If you don't like Zogby, check the Gallup Organization, USA Today, and CNN...they all ran similar polls and got similar results.
And because he said...it means every single person in the same political party thinks it true! By that logic, because Bush cant speak proper English (nuc-u-lar, Great British, etc) all Republicans cant speak proper English either.
Sarahbelle18 Wrote:dfarr Wrote:Sarahbelle18 Wrote:dfarr Wrote:Sarahbelle18 Wrote:dfarr Wrote:Sarahbelle18 Wrote:Well, the point is, the public has been fed a lot of wrong information and far-fetched notions about this war.
From "we will be greeted as liberators", to "the insurgency is in its last throes", to General Franks saying that we would have just 30000 troops on the ground by the end of 2003...and the list goes on. It's now 2006 and we have 130,000 troops on the ground, 2300 soldiers dead, and a over 17000 injured. Would I like to the Iraqi forces strong enough to protect the volatile ares? Of course I would. Am I putting a lot of faith into this actually happening in the near future? No, not really. I've been fooled too many times to believe it before I actually see it happen.
yeah, and iraq is on the brink of civil war, nobody wants us there, and our soldiers terrorize women and children in the middle of the night.
and your point is?
that there has been a lot more false badnews than good news.
So youre saying that the increase of secretarian violence couldnt lead to Civil War?
Nobody wants us there? I wouldnt say nobody, but the majority doesnt according to Zoghby polls.
Im not touching the terrorizing women, refer to the other thread for that.
of course it COULD, but it hasnt. all the major political/religious leaders helped calm the tensions after the golden dome was blown up.
oh, zogby? the same guy that said that kerry was ahead by 10 points? the very same zogby who's on the executive committee of the democratic national party? yeah, he's not biased.
yeah, i'd stay away from terrorizing women too, since according to the latest dem presidential nominee we are. but we love the military!!
Did they all hold hands and sing "kumbaya" too?
You may want to read the news, dfarr: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/con...00110.html
things arent looking so hot over there.
If you don't like Zogby, check the Gallup Organization, USA Today, and CNN...they all ran similar polls and got similar results.
And because he said...it means every single person in the same political party thinks it true! By that logic, because Bush cant speak proper English (nuc-u-lar, Great British, etc) all Republicans cant speak proper English either.
when did i say that there was no violence? i said that there isnt a civil war going on over there like most of the left is wishing happens.
You said that news of Iraq being on the verge of civil war is false and that tensions had been calmed since the golden dome was blown.
Sarahbelle18 Wrote:You said that news of Iraq being on the verge of civil war is false and that tensions had been calmed since the golden dome was blown.
you dont do context clues do u? i meant tensions between the different sects in iraq, not just general violence in iraq. do i have to spell out the meaning of every single statement i make?
dfarr Wrote:Sarahbelle18 Wrote:You said that news of Iraq being on the verge of civil war is false and that tensions had been calmed since the golden dome was blown.
you dont do context clues do u? i meant tensions between the different sects in iraq, not just general violence in iraq. do i have to spell out the meaning of every single statement i make?
Yes
Sarahbelle18 Wrote:dfarr Wrote:Sarahbelle18 Wrote:You said that news of Iraq being on the verge of civil war is false and that tensions had been calmed since the golden dome was blown.
you dont do context clues do u? i meant tensions between the different sects in iraq, not just general violence in iraq. do i have to spell out the meaning of every single statement i make?
Yes
k, ill keep that in mind. i keep forgetting your tscc education.
dfarr Wrote:Sarahbelle18 Wrote:dfarr Wrote:Sarahbelle18 Wrote:You said that news of Iraq being on the verge of civil war is false and that tensions had been calmed since the golden dome was blown.
you dont do context clues do u? i meant tensions between the different sects in iraq, not just general violence in iraq. do i have to spell out the meaning of every single statement i make?
Yes
k, ill keep that in mind. i keep forgetting your tscc education.
Yeah, maybe if the University of Alabama's Inner-City Commuter College had taught you to write in thoroughly and with depth instead of the vague, cryptic prating you ramble off I would understand what you're talking about.
Sarahbelle18 Wrote:dfarr Wrote:Sarahbelle18 Wrote:dfarr Wrote:Sarahbelle18 Wrote:You said that news of Iraq being on the verge of civil war is false and that tensions had been calmed since the golden dome was blown.
you dont do context clues do u? i meant tensions between the different sects in iraq, not just general violence in iraq. do i have to spell out the meaning of every single statement i make?
Yes
k, ill keep that in mind. i keep forgetting your tscc education.
Yeah, maybe if the University of Alabama's Inner-City Commuter College had taught you to write in thoroughly and with depth instead of the vague, cryptic prating you ramble off I would understand what you're talking about.
i didnt go to miles college.
dfarr Wrote:Sarahbelle18 Wrote:dfarr Wrote:Sarahbelle18 Wrote:dfarr Wrote:Sarahbelle18 Wrote:You said that news of Iraq being on the verge of civil war is false and that tensions had been calmed since the golden dome was blown.
you dont do context clues do u? i meant tensions between the different sects in iraq, not just general violence in iraq. do i have to spell out the meaning of every single statement i make?
Yes
k, ill keep that in mind. i keep forgetting your tscc education.
Yeah, maybe if the University of Alabama's Inner-City Commuter College had taught you to write in thoroughly and with depth instead of the vague, cryptic prating you ramble off I would understand what you're talking about.
i didnt go to miles college.
Obviously...otherwise we wouldnt be having this discussion.