I don't think irony applies here.
BlazerSax Wrote:I don't think irony applies here.
irony: Incongruity between what might be expected and what actually occurs
handguns are banned in DC. former DC mayor gets robbed at gunpoint in DC. do u see the irony?
BlazerSax Wrote:I don't think irony applies here.
its an example of "irony of fate". In this case a situation resembling poetic justice, but lacking the aspect of justice.
dfarr Wrote:BlazerSax Wrote:I don't think irony applies here.
irony: Incongruity between what might be expected and what actually occurs
handguns are banned in DC. former DC mayor gets robbed at gunpoint in DC. do u see the irony?
It's not ironic. Guns are banned, and somebody broke the law by having one in his possession. That's no more ironic than someone getting busted with cocaine in their car. It's illegal.
BlazerSax Wrote:I don't think irony applies here.
Obviously, Sax you are too ignorant to understand the significance of this story. First off, the mayor probably pushed for the law to make handguns illegal. If not, then he obviously supports it. Second, handguns are like alcohol during proabition. You cannot keep guns out of a city. Thirdly, the right to bear arms. If the mayor was protecting himself, then he probably wouldn't have been in danger.
uab278 Wrote:BlazerSax Wrote:I don't think irony applies here.
Obviously, Sax you are too ignorant to understand the significance of this story. First off, the mayor probably pushed for the law to make handguns illegal. If not, then he obviously supports it. Second, handguns are like alcohol during proabition. You cannot keep guns out of a city. Thirdly, the right to bear arms. If the mayor was protecting himself, then he probably wouldn't have been in danger.
An ironic situation would be if the mayor had banned guns, then somebody ended up saving his life one day by shooting an attacker with a handgun.
THAT'S ironic.
BlazerSax Wrote:uab278 Wrote:BlazerSax Wrote:I don't think irony applies here.
Obviously, Sax you are too ignorant to understand the significance of this story. First off, the mayor probably pushed for the law to make handguns illegal. If not, then he obviously supports it. Second, handguns are like alcohol during proabition. You cannot keep guns out of a city. Thirdly, the right to bear arms. If the mayor was protecting himself, then he probably wouldn't have been in danger.
An ironic situation would be if the mayor had banned guns, then somebody ended up saving his life one day by shooting an attacker with a handgun.
THAT'S ironic.
sax there are many forms of irony. if you had gone to class instead of getting high you might just know that. hell i even spelled out the specific type of irony and gave a defenition in my last post and you still couldnt get it.
BlazerSax Wrote:[quote="draak ijveraar"][quote="BlazerSax"][quote="uab278"][quote="BlazerSax"]
You're a moron, LOL!
and you are a 21 year old college dropout pothead virgin who instead of trying to get laid spends all of his time on the internet. and the proof is the over 10,000 posts you have made. its just too bad so few had any merit.
i still cant get over a pothead not being able to get laid. christ boy youre hanging out with girls who get high how can you not get some? you are a disgrace to all selfrespecting current and past potheads.
draak ijveraar Wrote:i still cant get over a pothead not being able to get laid. christ boy youre hanging out with girls who get high how can you not get some? you are a disgrace to all selfrespecting current and past potheads.
I say this with NO defense of Sax, but
"Takes one to know one?"
Sax trying to defend himself when he is wrong == Topic turning into smack
uab278 Wrote:Sax trying to defend himself when he is wrong == Topic turning into smack
No, other forum users attacking Sax and Sax defending himself == Topic turning into smack
BlazerSax Wrote:Blzer4Life Wrote:I say this with NO defense of Sax, but
+1, thank you Blzer4Life.
OK, I've had it. This is the 3rd thread you've derailed
today. Either grow a set and learn how to have a sense of humor or quit posting. Stop being as hard-headed as a rock and realize that *gasp* other people can be right!!! I don't think you should be BANNED yet, but maybe it would be a good thing until the ignore feature is ready. I'd be we lose fewer posters that way.
Sorry for further throwing this thread off track...
And PS - don't use my initials, please.
Blzer4Life Wrote:BlazerSax Wrote:Blzer4Life Wrote:I say this with NO defense of Sax, but
+1, thank you Blzer4Life.
OK, I've had it. This is the 3rd thread you've derailed today. Either grow a set and learn how to have a sense of humor or quit posting. Stop being as hard-headed as a rock and realize that *gasp* other people can be right!!! I don't think you should be BANNED yet, but maybe it would be a good thing until the ignore feature is ready. I'd be we lose fewer posters that way.
Sorry for further throwing this thread off track...
And PS - don't use my initials, please.
I don't have to, the link to your website with your full name is right below every post you make.
Blzer4Life Wrote:draak ijveraar Wrote:i still cant get over a pothead not being able to get laid. christ boy youre hanging out with girls who get high how can you not get some? you are a disgrace to all selfrespecting current and past potheads.
I say this with NO defense of Sax, but
"Takes one to know one?"
i was talking from a viewpoint that i was well aquainted with. thats why at first i didnt believe he was a stoner.
draak ijveraar Wrote:Blzer4Life Wrote:I say this with NO defense of Sax, but
"Takes one to know one?"
i was talking from a viewpoint that i was well aquainted with. thats why at first i didnt believe he was a stoner.
That's what it sounded like!