better at point guard next year than anytime in history. With "Train" and Solomon the Wise, we should really be effective at that position. And for shooters, we'll have III, Phlash, and Cicic, who is reputed to be a great shooter. If we can replace Fowler, Patterson, and Edwards leadership, we might be better next year than we are this year. I like our chances, assuming all the players we're counting on come back to school.
(02-27-2009 05:41 PM)Dr. J. Wrote: [ -> ]better at point guard next year than anytime in history. With "Train" and Solomon the Wise, we should really be effective at that position. And for shooters, we'll have III, Phlash, and Cicic, who is reputed to be a great shooter. If we can replace Fowler, Patterson, and Edwards leadership, we might be better next year than we are this year. I like our chances, assuming all the players we're counting on come back to school.
Doc you've got too damn many nicknames for these guys. When it was just Matt, I think we all caught on to III pretty quick, but now you're throwing three or four others in the mix. If you want folks to comment on your post, you need to speak English.
But I agree. This might be the best year at point since I have followed the team, with the possible exception of "Iron Man" Graber.
(02-28-2009 08:28 AM)MICHAELSPAPPY Wrote: [ -> ]But I agree. This might be the best year at point since I have followed the team, with the possible exception of "Iron Man" Graber.
Graber was outstanding, and I'm not saying either player will be better than Graber, but he was one man, and we have two potentially outstanding point guards who can run the team. Sounds like a great situation. Another factor. We will probably not be expected to compete for the championship next year since we lose our three senior captains, so we could sneak up on some folks.
