NCAAbbs

Full Version: Report: ESPN, SEC agree to $2.25 billion TV deal...
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.

Quote:
The SEC has called a 3 p.m. press conference to announce a blockbuster television deal with ESPN that will, according to one published report, pay the conference a staggering $2.25 billion over the next 15 years.

Street & Smith’s Sports Business Journal reported this morning that the deal, which was agreed to during the SEC’s athletics directors’ meeting in Orlando last week, would pay the SEC about $150 million a year over the life of the contract. This comes on the heels of an announcement on Aug. 14 of a 15-year deal with CBS that will pay the conference about $55 million per year through the 2023 season. That deal would also triple the amount of television revenue from football that the league received under its old agreements, which end after the 2008 season.

This deal also eliminates the possibility of the SEC forming its own network. That’s because ESPN purchased all of the remaining television rights not held by CBS. This means that Raycom, which will show the 12:30 p.m. SEC game this season, will be shut out of the new deal.

ESPN will use all of rights to spread games throughout its various platforms: ESPN, ESPN2, ESPNU, ESPN360, ESPN’s various regional networks.

The Business Journal also reported that later this year ESPN will strike a deal with Comcast Cable to put ESPNU in about 7 million Comcast homes. That number could grow to as many as 14 million. ESPN will also use its syndication arm, ESPN Regional Television in Charlotte, to handle distribution of games to local television stations.

Exactly what all of this means to the consumer of SEC football remains to be seen. But this much is true. The big boys of television have decided that SEC football is a good long-term investment.

“The SEC has been great for 75 years and it’s not going anywhere,” said Mike Aresco, the Vice-President of Programming at CBS. “It’s only going to get better.”


http://www.ajc.com/sports/content/sports...tract.html

04-jawdropCUSA isn't quite the SEC, but maybe we could get a deal for just $1 billion?
So when will I be able to buy stock in the SEC?
Does this mean that the boosters won't have to pay the players quite so much in the future? It sounds like the schools should have plenty of $$$ to pay the athletes and recruits.
Britton Banowsky needs to be on the phone with the Raycom Sports folks TODAY. They probably can't have any deal in place in the immediate future because of current contracts. But he'd better be letting them know that C-USA would love to do some form of business with them down the road.

Sliding C-USA in for Raycom's Game of the Week would provide more regional coverage than the current CSS slate does.
BlazerUnit beat me to it; we need to be talking to Raycom now.
Can Raycom continue to be in the business of showing college football games if they are not showing the SEC?

They also own several TV stations in our market area. A deal with C*USA (and maybe even the Sun Belt) would allow them to have the local rights to show a lot of home-team football games.

GreenMississippi Wrote:
Can Raycom continue to be in the business of showing college football games if they are not showing the SEC?

They also own several TV stations in our market area. A deal with C*USA (and maybe even the Sun Belt) would allow them to have the local rights to show a lot of home-team football games.


Raycom has always had ACC games as well. I think the CUSA teams would have a hard time getting much play time in the ACC areas.

It would be nice to see a block of CUSA teams in the SEC area get a contract with Raycom to show some games. Maybe USM, UAB, Memphis, & UCF.

MondoMiner Wrote:
04-jawdropCUSA isn't quite the SEC, but maybe we could get a deal for just $1 billion?


Unfortunately for CUSA what this means is that ESPN has a vested interest in protecting the SEC from competition, i.e. CUSA with several teams in the SEC footprint will be ignored and or dumped on in any form or fashion by the espn gang. ESPN's BCS bias will get a big boost.

GreenMississippi Wrote:
They also own several TV stations in our market area. A deal with C*USA (and maybe even the Sun Belt) would allow them to have the local rights to show a lot of home-team football games.


Exactly. Even if you had to split time with the SunBelt I think it could work. Even with their ACC rights, I don't think Raycom wants to just let that much business go once their current SEC deal runs out. There's nothing to lose from talking to them.

C-USA has plenty of options.
Raycom is a good idea.
While they're at it, Raycom owns WUAB in Ohio. I think it is time they changed names and WUAB in Birmingham is born. Raycom is an Alabama-based (Montgomery) company.
This contract boosts our CSTV (CSCBS) deal. Those games will not be available to CSTV to show.
Tulane guys..why did you guys leave the SEC again??

Soaring Eagle Wrote:
This contract boosts our CSTV (CSCBS) deal. Those games will not be available to CSTV to show.


That's what I was thinking. (hoping)

BYUcoog Wrote:
Tulane guys..why did you guys leave the SEC again??

Heh, many of us have, of course, asked ourselves that exact question at some point over the past 3 decades or so.

The simple fact is that membership in a conference-- *Any* conference-- was just not that big a deal in 1964. Nobody realized what the landscape would look like 44 years down the road.

It should be pointed out that Tulane, like Vanderbilt, was and is much more restrictive in terms of its athletic recruiting than the other members of the SEC. For a long time those two schools were considered academic peers. I can honestly say that, just for myself, I would rather Tulane not be looking back on 25 consecutive losing seasons-- and a probable 25 more on the way-- even in exchange for every one of those 2.25 billion dollars.

They are still able to build a good basketball program. If Vandy took football relatively seriously (like Stanford for example) they could certainly do a decent job of locking down the smart east coast footballers in the way Stanford has the west coast locked down with the ability to snatch east coast kids here and there. Same could have applied for Tulane.
Magnolia League: Notre Dame - Navy - Army - Tulsa - Tulane - Rice - SMU - TCU - *Xavier - *St. Louis
Would Tulane (and Tulsa, Rice, SMU, TCU) sell it's soul for some winning seasons and Notre Dame/NBC money?

There is something to say about being competitive in your league and academic integrity, so I applaud Tulane for leaving the SEC. I would have had a heart attack if I knew where the SEC was going, but that's another story.
Reference URL's