NCAAbbs

What you mean Obama can't lie about lying?!? That's just not right!!!

At the 1:15 mark in this video you can see how indignant he acts when he accuses them of lying, UNREAL!!! Reminiscent of “I did not have sex with that woman.”

Did Obama Lie About Born Alive Bill?

Quote:

After his nationally televised interview with Pastor Rick Warren on Saturday night in Orange County, Calif., Mr. Obama sat down with Christian Broadcasting Network's David Brody and went on the attack against pro-life activists, whom he said were "lying" about his vote to kill a bill protecting babies born alive following botched abortions.

Quote:

As it turns out - and as even Mr. Obama's campaign admitted Monday to the New York Sun - the National Right to Life Committee wasn't lying; Mr. Obama was. The specific difference cited by Mr. Obama in the CBN interview was that the Illinois bill didn't contain the federal legislation's language explicitly stating that it would not "undermine Roe vs. Wade." (This was not merely off-the-cuff, as the campaign had issued a written statement to CNN in June offering the same rationale.) Not only did the bill contain the exact provision from the federal bill, but Mr. Obama voted in favor of adding it as an amendment. After the state bill was changed to be almost identical to the unanimously passed federal law, Mr. Obama voted against it.

Obama supporters have said there was already a bill in place in Illinois to protect babies born alive. That begs the question if there was why wasn't the doctor who ordered the baby thrown in the soiled linens closet charged with a crime?

One last ditch effort by an Obama supporter last night tried to give Obama an out by saying other legislation was attached to the bill, they had to back down when a copy of the said bill was produced and no additional legislation was indeed attached.

You know... this has been going on for quite some time... I'm trying to be reasonable minded, and realize that there are MANY reasons for a politician to vote for or against something that aren't as obvious as the title or main provisions of a bill...

However...

It seems that he was the chairman of the committee. If there was something not in the bill he wanted, or something in the bill he didn't, there should be some documented testimony or something where the chairman asks for something to be added or stricken, no?? There was a staff member at the time whom he told... "go tell Senator X, if he wants my vote, he needs to change _____"... and i suspect there is some sort of a paper trail. There should be a way to point to the specific differences between the federal and state bills that he is speaking of. No, I don't expect him to do it himself, but he has a lot of money and a large staff.

This should be EASY for him to defeat... and there should be paperwork to show what the chairman of a committee crafting a bill wanted and didn't want.

THE NC Herd Fan

Hambone10