07-03-2008, 08:23 AM
Can't the Athletic Department get a MasterCard? It's what the rest of us are having to do considering how 'Bush's economic' plan has worked out.
under klinton, 5.5% unemployment was considered great. My, how opinions have changed.
We've had it so good [under the bush plan] some don't know what to do when market forces come into play in a negative manner.
Oil prices wouldn't be this high if we'd started drilling our own reserves ten years ago.
W has done some stupid things, but everything isn't his fault.
Bush's economic problems stem from allowing congress to spend like drunken sailors.
Congress brought us the financial/banking problems a few face today.
The epa, if left to operate status quo, will be the death of our current economy.
Bush should have never allowed Ted Kennedy to help author nclb.
there are others..........
He's a dunce for trying to play nice with the opposition.
derailing rant over
under klinton, 5.5% unemployment was considered great. My, how opinions have changed.
We've had it so good [under the bush plan] some don't know what to do when market forces come into play in a negative manner.
Oil prices wouldn't be this high if we'd started drilling our own reserves ten years ago.
W has done some stupid things, but everything isn't his fault.
Bush's economic problems stem from allowing congress to spend like drunken sailors.
Congress brought us the financial/banking problems a few face today.
The epa, if left to operate status quo, will be the death of our current economy.
Bush should have never allowed Ted Kennedy to help author nclb.
there are others..........
He's a dunce for trying to play nice with the opposition.
derailing rant over
Actually no, it doesn't matter if they started drilling 10 years ago, the major reason for high gas prices is because of a loop in the farm bill.
under klinton, 5.5% unemployment was considered great. My, how opinions have changed.
We've had it so good [under the bush plan] some don't know what to do when market forces come into play in a negative manner.
Oil prices wouldn't be this high if we'd started drilling our own reserves ten years ago.
W has done some stupid things, but everything isn't his fault.
Bush's economic problems stem from allowing congress to spend like drunken sailors.
Congress brought us the financial/banking problems a few face today.
The epa, if left to operate status quo, will be the death of our current economy.
Bush should have never allowed Ted Kennedy to help author nclb.
there are others..........
He's a dunce for trying to play nice with the opposition.
derailing rant over
Actually no, it doesn't matter if they started drilling 10 years ago, the major reason for high gas prices is because of a loop in the farm bill.
could be. ethanol is a ruse, for certain. it costs more to produce, as well as drives up the cost of food.
my contention is, if we would have started ten years ago we would have upped our own production, today,
from 8.263 million barrels per day (9/2007 levels) to approx. 10.3 million barrels per day.
This would've positioned us as the second largest oil producing country in the world. http://internationaltradecommodities.sui..._countries
We would still have to import roughly 1/2 of our oil for consumption but 2+ million more barrels per day on the global market
would ease concerns over supply, thus lowering the bids of speculators (oil futures traders).
Opening ANWR and the continental shelf isn't the only answer, but it certainly would've helped.
under klinton, 5.5% unemployment was considered great. My, how opinions have changed.
We've had it so good [under the bush plan] some don't know what to do when market forces come into play in a negative manner.
Oil prices wouldn't be this high if we'd started drilling our own reserves ten years ago.
W has done some stupid things, but everything isn't his fault.
Bush's economic problems stem from allowing congress to spend like drunken sailors.
Congress brought us the financial/banking problems a few face today.
The epa, if left to operate status quo, will be the death of our current economy.
Bush should have never allowed Ted Kennedy to help author nclb.
there are others..........
He's a dunce for trying to play nice with the opposition.
derailing rant over
Actually no, it doesn't matter if they started drilling 10 years ago, the major reason for high gas prices is because of a loop in the farm bill.
Or that whole supply/demand thing
under klinton, 5.5% unemployment was considered great. My, how opinions have changed.
We've had it so good [under the bush plan] some don't know what to do when market forces come into play in a negative manner.
Oil prices wouldn't be this high if we'd started drilling our own reserves ten years ago.
W has done some stupid things, but everything isn't his fault.
Bush's economic problems stem from allowing congress to spend like drunken sailors.
Congress brought us the financial/banking problems a few face today.
The epa, if left to operate status quo, will be the death of our current economy.
Bush should have never allowed Ted Kennedy to help author nclb.
there are others..........
He's a dunce for trying to play nice with the opposition.
derailing rant over
Actually no, it doesn't matter if they started drilling 10 years ago, the major reason for high gas prices is because of a loop in the farm bill.
could be. ethanol is a ruse, for certain. it costs more to produce, as well as drives up the cost of food.
my contention is, if we would have started ten years ago we would have upped our own production, today,
from 8.263 million barrels per day (9/2007 levels) to approx. 10.3 million barrels per day.
This would've positioned us as the second largest oil producing country in the world. http://internationaltradecommodities.sui..._countries
We would still have to import roughly 1/2 of our oil for consumption but 2+ million more barrels per day on the global market
would ease concerns over supply, thus lowering the bids of speculators (oil futures traders).
Opening ANWR and the continental shelf isn't the only answer, but it certainly would've helped.
I don't think it would change much in the cost. honestly, we fix the issues with speculators today, the price drops by half by tuesday.
THIS would be incorrect.
facts:
90% of all ANS crude is used to supply refineries in alaska, hawaii and on the west coast
http://www.ftc.gov/os/2000/04/bpamacoana.htm
US refinery operable capacity http://www.eia.doe.gov/neic/rankings/refineries.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_oil_refineries
US oil production http://indexmundi.com/g/r.aspx?t=20&v=88&l=en
US oil exports http://indexmundi.com/g/r.aspx?t=20&v=95&l=en
US oil consumption http://indexmundi.com/g/r.aspx?t=20&v=91&l=en
US oil imports http://indexmundi.com/g/r.aspx?t=20&v=93&l=en
12% export is hardly 'most or all.' much of the exported product goes to Canada, our largest oil supplier.
http://import-export.suite101.com/articl...untry_2007
Lou, I doubt the price would fall by half, but accepting that it would does not minimize the importance of "speculators" in any futures exchange transaction. Futures traders are just that, traders that speculate on future supply demand functions. If they left the market today and prices were lowered the oil owuld get used up that much faster.
As oil consumption would certainly increase as its cost declines the long-term supply would shrink which would a priori have an upwward effect on oil prices. That is unless short selling and "speculating" were for some dumbass reason to become regulated market practices.
Oh wait, they probably will be. Stocks cannot be shorted because that hurts investors, and Oil cannot be longed because that hurts consumers. Central Planning - hoorayyyyy!