06-30-2008, 05:33 PM
06-30-2008, 05:55 PM
Or is it more right wing lies?


07-01-2008, 03:19 PM
07-01-2008, 03:42 PM
So the results were skewed because he has a male chief of staff and a male legislative director. If he had hired women to those posts, they would be skewed the other way. I'd like to see statistics for people in the same job position or pay grade. I'm willing to bet they're the same.
07-02-2008, 07:26 PM
dfarr Wrote:
http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewPolitics.asp?Page=/Politics/archive/200804/POL20080430a.html
Maybe this one will work.
Maybe this one will work.
This is my favorite quote of the story:
"Because the report only covered a half year, the salaries listed for those six months were simply multiplied by two to determine the annual amount. In several cases, staff members only worked a portion of the six-month period. To arrive at an annual salary for these employees, Cybercast News Service divided the total amount they were paid by the number of days they worked, then multiplied that number by 365. "
Also when did they get the info?
The information for the analysis on the three presidential candidates was taken from the Report of the Secretary of the Senate that covered the six-month period ending Sept. 30, 2007.
pretty early, you think?