NCAAbbs

Full Version: Hello
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
03-no The objectifying and dehumanizing of females on this board sickens me. 03-no

riflearm3 Wrote:
03-no The objectifying and dehumanizing of females on this board sickens me. 03-no


What are you talking about??? These women work hard to get in the shape they're in and I appreciate that hard work. Don't forget, many of the women you see got paid when they voluntarily had their pictures taken. So who is really taking advantage the situation? I know I'm not making any money from those pictures. And what's the difference between what these women are doing and what male body builders do? Don't they both work out just so they can stand around in skimpy bathing suits and have people assess the results of that hard work?

I'm pretty sure he's kidding, unless someone hijacked his account.
Its just a matter of time before the iron fist of governent stops this objectification of the females.05-mafia...Damn...Where will the losers go for sexual gratification?03-lmfao

riflearm3 Wrote:
03-no The objectifying and dehumanizing of females on this board sickens me. 03-no


can you post some examples?

so leave

calvin12 Wrote:

riflearm3 Wrote:
03-no The objectifying and dehumanizing of females on this board sickens me. 03-no


can you post some examples?



sure. i find all of the below pictures sickening. of course, as always, there are pictures of these same females that i find even more disgusting in my personal vault:

[ REMOVED DUE TO TAKE DOWN REQUEST FROM JUSTIN PRICE ]

[ REMOVED DUE TO TAKE DOWN REQUEST FROM JUSTIN PRICE ]



















And here I am thinking you were serious!!!!

The blonde in the pink bikini...Hubba hubba
welcome back rifle! Seems like more than a year that you've been gone.... Please share more of your vault!
I'm not sure whether I'm disgusted or not. I need a few examples to help me figure it out.

Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:
I'm not sure whether I'm disgusted or not. I need a few examples to help me figure it out.


Whilst you might have the privilidge of needing just a few samples to arrive at your decision, I, on the other hand, would prefer as many samples as possible as to be certain I'll make the best decision possible.

riflearm -- no posting of Justin Price material. That would include an awful lot of stuff from bullz-eye. He's new to this thing called "the internet":

Quote:
I am a professional photographer and my photos are
posted on your site

http://ncaabbs.com/showthread.php?tid=301161

My logo Justin Price.com is on the photos and the
photos are being used to insult the model in the
photo. This user constantly steals my photos and puts
them on your site, can you delete his profile already.
Here is another link where he has stolen photos from
http://www.bullz-eye.com which I shoot for and they own the
copyrights and again the photos are being used to
insult the girl.

http://ncaabbs.com/showthread.php?tid=302874

This is ridiculous that this user is allowed to stay
on. I want all of these photos removed immediately.
Any questions you can call me (redacted)

Lame. I'd never know who the guy was if his pictures weren't posted on this board. What if I wanted some sexy pictures taken of me while listening to an awesome "Filter" song? I know he'd be the one to go to.

Raider_ATO Wrote:
Lame. I'd never know who the guy was if his pictures weren't posted on this board. What if I wanted some sexy pictures taken of me while listening to an awesome "Filter" song? I know he'd be the one to go to.


Wonder if he paid for the rights to use that song commercially ...............

georgia_tech_swagger Wrote:

Raider_ATO Wrote:
Lame. I'd never know who the guy was if his pictures weren't posted on this board. What if I wanted some sexy pictures taken of me while listening to an awesome "Filter" song? I know he'd be the one to go to.


Wonder if he paid for the rights to use that song commercially ...............


ill check. i am a partner in an entertainment management company that is affiliated with a bigger label in miami beach. from my somewhat limited knowledge of this, the use wouldnt fit under the fair use guidelines.

one artist we have helped, brett dennen, had about 25 seconds of his song used in a recent hilton commercial and was paid well for it (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NthhizcmEGc).

ill find out who owns master rights and publishing rights to the filter song and if royalties are being paid.

There is no way it is inside the fair free use guidelines. EMI most likely owns it. It's not often a band owns their own recordings. It's authors probably include Richard Patrick, the lead singer.

EDIT: Found the copyright info at US Copyright Office. Sorry, finding this stuff is practically my job. I'd have to make some calls to find out who has licensed it, most likely they'd just ask where its being used and they'd follow through with a takedown. But, there's no reason to be a dick about this. I think he's a big enough one for both sides of the situation.
Raider is absolutely right that this doesn't come close to "fair use" under the copyright statute. Whether he has a license is another story - I have no way of knowing that.
Reference URL's