NCAAbbs

Full Version: Verdict in Runaway Bride Trial
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
She pleaded no contest and she was sentenced to probation, community service and a fine.

Good. Jailtime was wholly unnecessary.






LAWRENCEVILLE, Ga. — With her once-jilted fiancé at her side, runaway bride Jennifer Wilbanks (search) pleaded no contest Thursday to a felony charge and wept as she was sentenced to probation, community service and a fine.

"I'm truly sorry for my actions and I just want to thank Gwinnett County and the city of Duluth," a crying Wilbanks told the judge as she pleaded to a charge of making a false statement.

She was sentenced to two years of probation and 120 hours of community service. The judge also ordered her to continue mental health treatment and pay the sheriff's office $2,550.

If she successfully completes her probation, the felony will be erased from her record, Gwinnett County District Attorney Danny Porter (search) said.

Wilbanks, whose disappearance before her wedding in April created a nationwide sensation, was indicted last week on charges of making a false statement and making a false police report.

Wilbanks was wearing a black outfit and running shoes as she arrived at the Gwinnett County courthouse Thursday to make her plea. Her fiancé John Mason (search), whom she was to have married April 30 in a lavish ceremony, was by her side.

Wilbanks could have faced up to six years in prison and $11,000 in fines if convicted of both charges. She could also have been ordered to reimburse authorities for the cost of the search, which has been tallied at more than $50,000.

She's already agreed to pay part of the tab: On Tuesday, she said she would pay $13,250 to the city of Duluth, Ga., to help offset the overtime costs the city incurred searching for her.

"She's done everything that we would ask of her," Wilbanks' attorney Lydia Sartain, said Thursday morning before sentencing. "She has accepted responsibility."

Wilbanks, a nurse, disappeared from her Duluth home on April 26 and took a bus to Las Vegas and then Albuquerque, N.M. She initially claimed she was abducted and sexually assaulted, but later recanted and said she fled because of unspecified personal issues days before the high-profile wedding.

Family members say she has been receiving psychiatric treatment at an unspecified facility.
A plea bargain is not a verdict. The case did not go to trial.

She probably agreed to the plea bargain to avoid jail time - which I will always believe she deserved.

"Wilbanks could have faced up to six years in prison and $11,000 in fines if convicted of both charges. She could also have been ordered to reimburse authorities for the cost of the search, which has been tallied at more than $50,000."
LJBlazerFan Wrote:A plea bargain is not a verdict. The case did not go to trial.
Ticky-tack semantics :crying:
A verdict is issued by a judge or a jury.

Neither happened in this case.
LJBlazerFan Wrote:A verdict is issued by a judge or a jury.

Neither happened in this case.
:sleep:
I'll take that emoticon to be as close as you're able to get to, "Hey, you're right. I made a mistake."
LJBlazerFan Wrote:I'll take that emoticon to be as close as you're able to get to, "Hey, you're right. I made a mistake."
No, it means, "You're making a mountain out of a mole hill."
Saying someone was convicted or acquitted (ie, a verdict) is SIGNIFICANTLY different than agreeing to a plea bargain.

That is not a mole hill, by any means.
LJBlazerFan Wrote:Saying someone was convicted or acquitted (ie, a verdict) is SIGNIFICANTLY different than agreeing to a plea bargain.

That is not a mole hill, by any means.
This is also not an academic arena. It's just two regular guys having a regular conversation on a regular forum.
Who said it was an "academic arena"? You made a blatant mistake, and I corrected it. For whatever reason, you took offense.

Please do not presume to compare you and I, or our conversations, as even being remotely close to similar.
LJBlazerFan Wrote:Who said it was an "academic arena"? You made a blatant mistake, and I corrected it. For whatever reason, you took offense.

Please do not presume to compare you and I, or our conversations, as even being remotely close to similar.
I never would. To do so would require presenting myself as a moron.
BlazerSax Wrote:...It's just two regular guys having a regular conversation on a regular forum.
Actually, you did. And, before you make something else up, it's just you and me in this thread. You could not possibly have been referring to anyone else.

Thanks for calling names, though.
Reference URL's