Way to go Mack Mac!!
Chris Turner
C-USA has some great coaches...
good get for ECU.
Go Tigers!!!
Drew
This clueless poster above tried to put him down.
Check the coaches hotseat thread.
Ask any Marshall fan about Mack, he kicked our tails in some of our best years in the past 25 years. He's a great coach and a helluva guy.
well...being from Memphis with family in Chattanooga i know a little about UTC.
lets start with the fact UTC plays in a 11,000 seat arena...
while at UTC, coach Mac won 243 games, leading UTC to a Sweet 16.
he was also the head coach at VCU for 4 years, winning 65 games.
he's a perfect fit for ECU, and he seems to be recruiting well.
Go Tigers!!!
Drew
Imagine what he might do when he and his staff gets a whole year to build relationships with the underclassman and with a winning program to sale. Looks like he has us on the way stocking the shelf towards that goal.Hey The other Greg Childress, you remember when you told me a couple weeks ago Mac would never be able to recruit at a level high enough to get us to post season or ever be anything more than a .500 CUSA team. We just beat out a dozen or more BCS schools on those two guys. Good ones too.
He's another clueless poster.
Imagine what he might do when he and his staff gets a whole year to build relationships with the underclassman and with a winning program to sale. Looks like he has us on the way stocking the shelf towards that goal.Hey The other Greg Childress, you remember when you told me a couple weeks ago Mac would never be able to recruit at a level high enough to get us to post season or ever be anything more than a .500 CUSA team. We just beat out a dozen or more BCS schools on those two guys. Good ones too.
Jonesing you are a piece of work. USM signs a great recruiting class in football full of thee and four stars. Even a five star. You blast USM as having really done nothing in doing that and poke fun at us winning a "recruiting trophy". Now you are ogasmic over two basketball recruits. Like I said, you are a piece of work. 

Not really. You just don't have a clue on the difference in the sports. Basketball recruiting is 10 times more acurate than football and I said that at the same time when I talked about football recruiting because I knew some one that didn't know his **** would bring it up one day.
It's because of the 30+ games a year in basketball vs 12-15 in football (of which a player only plays about half the plays as well), and then the entire AAU summer for basketball to scout. Basketball players do not fall through the cracks like football players. There are also a hell of a lot fewer that play basketball and to identify on the court than the field 50+ vs 12 and less focus as well. When's the last time anyone couldn't spot a 6-8 guy that could play hoops in 50+ games a year of action.
Also football is a physical sport in which players all require weight training and can be built int he weight room, and you have no clue really how they will respond in a weight training program. Some guys get into a weight program and add 100 lbs and you can't see genetics or #'s of mucle fibers on who can do that. Its far more unpredictable and with the shear numbers so much higher much harder to identify the best players especially in 12 games.
We just had a 1 star unknow player go in the first round last week. Look at the NBA first round and tell me how many were off them recruiting map and then look at the NFL one and tell me the difference. It's not even comparable. We aren't even good in hoops and I know this kind of crab. Get a clue. Your the piece of work spouting off looking silly.

Not really. You just don't have a clue on the difference in the sports. Basketball recruiting is 10 times more acurate than football and I said at the same time when I talked about football recruiting because I knew some one that didn't know his **** would bring it up one day.
It's because of the 30+ games a year in basketball vs 12 in football (of which a player only plays about half the plays as well), and then the entire AAU summer for basketball to scout. Basketball players do not fall through the cracks like football players. There are also a hell of a lot fewer to identify or on a team or that play in general 60+ vs 12. When's the last time anyone couldn't spot a 6-8 guy that could play? in 50+ games a year of action.
Also football is a physical sport in which players all require weight training and can be built int he weight room, and you have no clue really how they will respond in a weight training program. Some guys get into a weight program and add 100 lbs and you can't see genetics. Its far more unpredictiable and with the shear numbers so much higher much harder to identify the best players especially in 12 games.
We just had a 2 star player go in the first round last week. Look at the NBA first round and tell me how many were off them recruiting map and then look at the NFL one and tell me the difference. It's not even comparable. We aren't even good in hoops and I know this kind of crab. Get a clue. Your the piece of work spouting off looking silly.
Honestly Jonesing, yoiu give "homer" a whole new level of being. Your spin is just unreal. If ECU had signed a recruiting class like USM did in football you would have been here everday raving about it. Like I said, you are a new level of "homer".
It's not spin. Look up the accuracy of each and get back to me next time you decide to spout off. Heck top basketball programs get commits in the 9th and 10th grade sometimes because they are that easy to pick out. Good luck trying to identify the football players that early. None of it is an exact science but football recruiting can't hold a candle to hoops & it doesn't take a genius to figure that out or the logical reasons why.
What was Fletcher ranked again? What about the forgetable 5 star Esterling(sp?) that rode the bench behind him? There is your importance of football recruiting. Now quit stinking up our thread. I didn't say anything about your football recruits on one of your numourous threads you bombarded us with. Only afterwards when you trying to beat your chest about them to me, in defending a coach that hasn't won a game yet and that's all you had to pump him up.
It's not spin. Look up the accuracy of each and get back to me next time you decide to spout off. Heck top basketball programs get commits in the 9th and 10th grade sometimes because they are that easy to pick out. Good luck trying to identify the football players that early. None of it is an exact science but football recruiting can't hold a candle to hoops & it doesn't take a genius to figure that out or the logical reasons why.
What was Fletcher ranked again? What about the forgetable 5 star Esterling(sp?) that rode the bench behind him? There is your importance of football recruiting. Now quit stinking up our thread. I didn't say anything about your football recruits on one of your numourous threads you bombarded us with. Only afterwards when you trying to beat your chest about them to me, in defending a coach that hasn't won a game yet and that's all you had to pump him up.
I can see with that great tradition of ECU basketball how you have become such an expert on rating basketball recruits.
If we had ever been there before, would we be this excited about recruits?
BTW, we have been in the tournament before, but it feels good knowing that we may be moving in that direction again.
Apparently you didn't read all my response because I said this a few post ago.
I said the exact thing at the same time we were talking about football recruiting .
It doesn't.
Oh looky Kentucky got a commit from an 8th grader today...... It's easier to spot talent in hoops. Nuff said.
http://rivalshoops.rivals.com/content.as...CID=803673
Mosley, this year's Sun Player of the Year, apparently accepted the offer before Turner did, which "really threw off my recruitment because I was really set on Maryland. Now I'm back on the market."
Turner said he would make a decision on a school in the next two weeks from a pool that includes Seton Hall, East Carolina, Baylor, Virginia, Clemson and Wake Forest, as well as Maryland.
http://www.baltimoresun.com/sports/highs...306.column
East Carolina and Wake Forest while eliminating Kentucky."
"He was very happy for the interest that Kentucky showed him, but
with it being so late in the game, they had a lot of ground to make
up in a short time," Wilson said Monday by phone.
"Right now, I feel like from my conversations with him, Seton Hall
and East Carolina, they're neck and neck," Wilson said. "
http://njmg.typepad.com/zagsblog/2008/03...er-up.html
Kentucky, Maryland, Wake, Virginia, Marquette. These are pretty good basketball schools we have beat out for these players I would say Greg Childers. Still never got back to me.
I think he is a great member to have on our staff. I had never heard of him prior to him being hired at ECU, but seems to be doing well here. I met him a few weeks back at a baseball game and is a really nice guy and envisions us being near the top of C-USA and in the NCAA tournament (what coach wouldnt).
He could very well be groomed to take over once Mack retires.
Now that's what I'm talking about!
Hey, a Pirate can dream can't he?
It's not spin. Look up the accuracy of each and get back to me next time you decide to spout off. Heck top basketball programs get commits in the 9th and 10th grade sometimes because they are that easy to pick out. Good luck trying to identify the football players that early. None of it is an exact science but football recruiting can't hold a candle to hoops & it doesn't take a genius to figure that out or the logical reasons why.
What was Fletcher ranked again? What about the forgetable 5 star Esterling(sp?) that rode the bench behind him? There is your importance of football recruiting. Now quit stinking up our thread. I didn't say anything about your football recruits on one of your numourous threads you bombarded us with. Only afterwards when you trying to beat your chest about them to me, in defending a coach that hasn't won a game yet and that's all you had to pump him up.
If you are going to bring up the Fletcher/Easterling thing, at least know what you are talking about. East wore a red shirt, at least until late in the season when it was burnt by our former head coach, an action that still baffles Southern Miss fans.
Fletcher is a hard working team player, East was not, the end result was the correct one. East sat behind Fletch because of his atlitude, not his ability.