NCAAbbs

are about to embark in a feud. Lawler may actually be one of the few WWE rasslers not on the juice. Interesting that WWE writes Lawler in on Raw at this time.

The King (the REAL King) usually gets in about one feud a year, just to stay active. There's no way he'll go over Booker, but I'm looking forward to it.

I say Lawler goes over Booker. I say this is will be a match to see who gets to use "The King" nickname. Which Booker needs to get out of. After a year and half its getting old. Plus Lawler has held the nick "The King" for more then 30 years, no way will he agree to give it up.

That makes sense. Hope to see it go down that way.

Raw was a good show tonight.

Mark my words, you read it here first...

Cody Rhodes is a STAR in the making.

Whatever "it" is that only certain guys in this business have that elevates them to the top, Cody Rhodes has "it".

I just hope Vince doesn't turn him into "SilverDust" or "PlatinumDust". I love the Character "GoldDust" but no way can he ever be repackaged in the WWE. If Dustin wants to work in WWE he will have to work as "GoldDust".

They can't have Lawler beat Booker. That would take away any reason for him to fight Triple H at Summer Slam. There is a reason they are billing Trips as the "King of Kings".

If Booker T is no longer doing the "kiss my ring" bit, then it is time to decrown Booker T.

Speaking of Booker T, I plan on taking my family to the next promotion his wrestling school puts on down here. I will give a report.

They started using "King of Kings" on HHH 5-6 months before he was injured so its nothing new. Booker T needs out of that gimmick yesterday not tomorrow. Its getting way old way to fast.

It's interesting to note that the WWE lost the patent on "King Booker", that Booker T is now on RAW, and King of the Ring is a SmackDown! exclusive.