NCAAbbs

It sucks, its pointless. I wish it would go away.

i like it. i get to see out of market teams though. STL doesn't really do interleague play as much as the others. nor does the NL central.

I'm nuetral. I really don't see what's so great about it, but whatever, it can stay. Doesn't hurt anybody and it is a little change of pace.

I like it because where else would you ever get to see the Astros and Rangers play each other.

i like it, it's fun to see every once in awhile. terpy, why do you dislike it?

depend on who your a fan of METS YANKS is great, but Cards Royals is horrible

TailgateTiger Wrote:depend on who your a fan of METS YANKS is great, but Cards Royals is horrible

yeah, but the cards don't only play the royals. plus, why is them playing the royals any worse than them playing the reds and pirates of the past few years?

flyingswoosh Wrote:

TailgateTiger Wrote:depend on who your a fan of METS YANKS is great, but Cards Royals is horrible

yeah, but the cards don't only play the royals. plus, why is them playing the royals any worse than them playing the reds and pirates of the past few years?

Exactly. I don't buy into this bad matchup theory from those opposed to interleague play. You could just as easily get the Devil Rays-Orioles. Who wants to watch that? The fact is, there are bad matchups in interleague play, and there's bad matchups in league play.

back in the summer of '69


amazing vs. o's



LOVE IT

I got the chance to see Zito pitch vs the Reds a couple of years back. I try to catch at least one interleague game a year.

American league fans watching San Fran can take their kids to see Bonds and his basketball sized head and preach the dangers of drugs to them...even if it's just cream and they claim they didn't know it was a drug. Just Say NO!!