03-03-2006, 02:37 PM
03-03-2006, 06:45 PM
I dont see it happening either, Guillen is a stud. Why did we trade this guy and not Kearns?? That still puzzles me.
03-03-2006, 09:55 PM
you traded him because he sure seemed like a one year wonder type of guy. i wouldn't blame the reds.
03-04-2006, 10:54 AM
flyingswoosh Wrote:you traded him because he sure seemed like a one year wonder type of guy. i wouldn't blame the reds.
He was our best player and its not like Guillen performing that well was a total surprise, he was susposed to be a stud coming up through the minors.
03-04-2006, 12:30 PM
JFlight21 Wrote:flyingswoosh Wrote:you traded him because he sure seemed like a one year wonder type of guy. i wouldn't blame the reds.
He was our best player and its not like Guillen performing that well was a total surprise, he was susposed to be a stud coming up through the minors.
yeah, but no offense, saying he was the reds best player, isn't exactly a big thing. and yes, he was supposed to be a stud, but he had a lot of years where he was a terrible hitter and a great fielder. it was a huge surprise when he became great.
03-05-2006, 10:19 AM
Update: Guillen only out 7-10 days (wrist inflamation)
03-05-2006, 11:58 AM
JFlight21 Wrote:Update: Guillen only out 7-10 days (wrist inflamation)
well, at least the nats can catch one break.