NCAAbbs

Full Version: Mike Krzyzewski and Political Games
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
From <a href='http://www.sportsbusinessnews.com/index.asp?story_id=20328' target='_blank'>http://www.sportsbusinessnews.com/index.as...?story_id=20328</a>


It wasn't as if the coach whose reputation could pass a white-glove test threw a campus keg party, but Mike Krzyzewski's campaign bash on Duke grounds left him scolded just the same. That and this report from The New York Times Selena Roberts
It wasn't as if the coach who rinses Cascade clean raised money to buy off recruits, but his fund-raiser for the Republican Elizabeth Dole was turned into an ethical violation in the Tar Heel State.

It wasn't as if the coach with the nasally voice of a man in need of Nyquil shouted "Blue Devils for Dole!" in his locker room, but Krzyzewski's public politics have left his character tobacco-stained in North Carolina.

Somehow, Saint Mike became the target of language reserved for attack ads after he dared to throw his Dookie-ness behind Dole in a tighter-than-expected United States Senate race.

He wasn't skewered for his political leaning, but for a reception he and his wife, Mickie, held for Dole at the university-owned Washington Duke Inn a month ago, inviting deep-pocket types from an undisclosed mailing list. Had Coach K dipped into a private university list? Had he created a tacit university endorsement by his association?

The issue caused a stir from Asheville to Kitty Hawk. Even the Duke newspaper, The Chronicle, criticized the unsavory appearance of Krzyzewski's role in the reception. It was like being heckled by his own Cameron Crazies.

Suddenly, Coach Klean had been sullied, as if his halo had been made of nothing more than tinfoil and pipe cleaners. For some reason, the meticulous coach who had always kept a lid on his politics in the past hadn't anticipated a game plan for the outrage.

"It was a firestorm," Mike Munger, chairman of the political science department at Duke, said. "He was probably appalled by the attention. If asked about it, he'll probably stare at you solemnly."

Who can ask if he won't return a call on the subject of politics? "He's really busy, very busy," the Duke P.R. man said. (Code for he's ducking like a man running from a helicopter.)

Too bad he's snakebitten. With so many sports figures scared out of their Nikes to take a stand, reduced to being apolitical in an effort to keep the endorsement cash flowing, Krzyzewski was doing more good than harm in his political stand.

When so many young people are feeling disenfranchised, Duke players pondering whether to register for their first punch of a chad could look at their coach and say, "At least the man votes."

Besides, coaches are never basted for the political undertones woven into their motivational philosophies. How many lead their teams in pregame prayers? How many use war references for motivation? Coaches dig General Patton books.

By all accounts, Krzyzewski has not proselytized to his players in Dole-isms (thou shall set screens and be a moderate conservative) or turned to subliminal campaign messages (placing cans of pineapple on the training table).

The Duke roster isn't exactly filled with North Carolina residents. And if Krzyzewski isn't welcomed into a recruit's home that happens to be filled with card-holding liberals, it won't be the first kid he loses to the University of North Carolina.

The only error in Krzyzewski's activism was na
Maryland fans, especially Smokefree, sometimes attack K for being a Republican. Who the hell are they/he kidding? In theory, Coach K is part of the majority when in comes to political views being that our facking country is run by Republicans. Supreme Court, Attorney General, House, Senate, oval office are all controlled by conservatives.

Not saying the above has anything to do with your post, TPC, I'm too lazy to read it. "Coach K" and "politics" just got me thinking.
The supreme court has been traditionally conservative, and your explanation that his political views are with the majority is flawed, when an extremely small percentage of the voters actually vote in the midterms, and that when a president wins the election (even if he gets help from the supreme court) then he/she will usually fill the positions with people of their own party

Doesn't matter if it's republican or democrat, they cant stand people outside their party in the oval office

And TPC, the article was interesting
No prob, anything to get people talking!
SSJT Wrote:The supreme court has been traditionally conservative, and your explanation that his political views are with the majority is flawed, when an extremely small percentage of the voters actually vote in the midterms, and that when a president wins the election (even if he gets help from the supreme court) then he/she will usually fill the positions with people of their own party

Doesn't matter if it's republican or democrat, they cant stand people outside their party in the oval office

And TPC, the article was interesting
Well duh, but that only applies to the Supreme Court and Attorney General. Senate, HOR and the oval office are all "basically" majority rules, barring the electoral college in the president's case.
My mistake


I got the impression you were trying to say that he was a part of majority of all the voters, not just the party that currently controls congress
Interesting posts, why isn't this on the Duke board? Rival fans have often compared Duke basketball to fascist regimes, what do Duke fans think about that? The fist salute, military background of K and Knight, right wing politics, trying to seize power within the athletic department and university, Cameron rallies and speaking out against the Duke administration, trying to censor the student paper and fansites and control the local and national media, etc., does any of this make people uncomfortable?
Deep Blue Wrote:Interesting posts, why isn't this on the Duke board? Rival fans have often compared Duke basketball to fascist regimes, what do Duke fans think about that? The fist salute, military background of K and Knight, right wing politics, trying to seize power within the athletic department and university, Cameron rallies and speaking out against the Duke administration, trying to censor the student paper and fansites and control the local and national media, etc., does any of this make people uncomfortable?
In Damascus fashion... 03-wink

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

:laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
Reference URL's