04-18-2004, 03:24 PM
04-18-2004, 03:35 PM
I agree. In order:
NL East
AL West
AL East
NL Central
NL West
AL Central
NL East
AL West
AL East
NL Central
NL West
AL Central
04-18-2004, 05:01 PM
nah, here's the order
al east
al west
nl east
nl central
nl west
al central
al east
al west
nl east
nl central
nl west
al central
04-19-2004, 08:10 AM
It's between the NL and AL East IMO. Baltimore looks to be pretty decent this year and could make a run with the new additions they've made, they are in first place right now. Yankees and Red Sox will be there in the end, and I look for the Blue Jays to pick things up...
The NL East is going to be brutal this year also...
The NL East is going to be brutal this year also...
04-21-2004, 08:02 AM
No one has said the NL Central is 1st but it is in this poll
04-21-2004, 02:07 PM
If the Pirates and Reds continue to play like this, the NL Central will be very strong.
04-21-2004, 02:35 PM
GDawgs88 Wrote:If the Pirates and Reds continue to play like this, the NL Central will be very strong.we're only like 3 weeks into the season. They'll fade eventually.
04-21-2004, 02:59 PM
That's why I said if. Neither of them have the pitching to hang around, IMO.
04-21-2004, 03:13 PM
GDawgs88 Wrote:That's why I said if. Neither of them have the pitching to hang around, IMO.i agree
04-21-2004, 04:56 PM
flyingswoosh Wrote:Not the Reds, but the Pirates certainly have the pitching to hang around, and they will. Benson, Wells, and Perez are studs.GDawgs88 Wrote:That's why I said if. Neither of them have the pitching to hang around, IMO.i agree
04-21-2004, 04:59 PM
cbfranchise3 Wrote:fogg is a good pitcher too. But i still don't think the pirates can hang around for that long. They have no hitting, and no bullpen.flyingswoosh Wrote:Not the Reds, but the Pirates certainly have the pitching to hang around, and they will. Benson, Wells, and Perez are studs.GDawgs88 Wrote:That's why I said if. Neither of them have the pitching to hang around, IMO.i agree
04-21-2004, 05:08 PM
flyingswoosh Wrote:When I say hang around, I mean in third or fourth place.cbfranchise3 Wrote:fogg is a good pitcher too. But i still don't think the pirates can hang around for that long. They have no hitting, and no bullpen.flyingswoosh Wrote:Not the Reds, but the Pirates certainly have the pitching to hang around, and they will. Benson, Wells, and Perez are studs.GDawgs88 Wrote:That's why I said if. Neither of them have the pitching to hang around, IMO.i agree
04-21-2004, 06:37 PM
cbfranchise3 Wrote:oh, i thought you meant something like second. my mistake. But, yeah, they can be 3rd or fourth. probably 4th.flyingswoosh Wrote:When I say hang around, I mean in third or fourth place.cbfranchise3 Wrote:fogg is a good pitcher too. But i still don't think the pirates can hang around for that long. They have no hitting, and no bullpen.flyingswoosh Wrote:Not the Reds, but the Pirates certainly have the pitching to hang around, and they will. Benson, Wells, and Perez are studs.GDawgs88 Wrote:That's why I said if. Neither of them have the pitching to hang around, IMO.i agree
04-21-2004, 07:50 PM
flyingswoosh Wrote:fogg is a good pitcher too.Not tonight, 8 ER in one inning.
04-21-2004, 08:05 PM
You cant diss the Reds without me in da house...LOL j/k
04-21-2004, 08:56 PM
cbfranchise3 Wrote:yea i know. he's had a rough start to the season so far. But i still think he's a good pitcher.flyingswoosh Wrote:fogg is a good pitcher too.Not tonight, 8 ER in one inning.
04-22-2004, 07:47 PM
cbfranchise3 Wrote:Yeah, but it's not likely Benson will be able to hold up for a full season. Perez has had some injuries, too.flyingswoosh Wrote:Not the Reds, but the Pirates certainly have the pitching to hang around, and they will. Benson, Wells, and Perez are studs.GDawgs88 Wrote:That's why I said if. Neither of them have the pitching to hang around, IMO.i agree
04-22-2004, 11:46 PM
NL or AL east! :D :rolleyes:
04-23-2004, 09:33 AM
I say the NL East and the NL Central. Mainly because the divisions have teams that are evenly matched and will beat up on each other. The Marlins have been playing great so far this season, good chance to get revenge on the Braves this weekend :D
04-23-2004, 09:45 PM
MaXx Wrote:The Marlins have been playing great so far this season, good chance to get revenge on the Braves this weekend :DNot tonight. :D
04-24-2004, 10:09 PM
<span style='font-size:14pt;line-height:100%'><span style='color:red'>How 'bout 'dem REDS?</span></span>
04-26-2004, 09:07 PM
UCBearcats1125 Wrote:<span style='font-size:14pt;line-height:100%'><span style='color:red'>How 'bout 'dem REDS?</span></span>They will cool off.
04-27-2004, 02:32 PM
cbfranchise3 Wrote:Most likely. But you never know if they can keep Griffey healthy.UCBearcats1125 Wrote:<span style='font-size:14pt;line-height:100%'><span style='color:red'>How 'bout 'dem REDS?</span></span>They will cool off.
05-01-2004, 01:55 PM
The Red's will get it back.
05-01-2004, 02:04 PM
3 straight in the L column...Should have won both Milwaukee games.
05-03-2004, 03:09 PM
4 losses in a row now...
05-03-2004, 04:15 PM
They are playing Houston, what did you expect?
05-06-2004, 10:53 AM
IMO, The NL Central is the best division in MLB, because great players in Sosa, Clemens, Griffey, Pettite, and a few others, this division is alsso compettive, because the Champ haven't been determined until september
05-06-2004, 02:01 PM
ucbearcat4ever Wrote:IMO, The NL Central is the best division in MLB, because great players in Sosa, Clemens, Griffey, Pettite, and a few others, this division is alsso compettive, because the Champ haven't been determined until septemberthat's an awful way to determine a great division. Plus, Griffey is not a great player. The NL west is by no means the best division, but they have Bonds, Schmidt, Helton, Gagne, Sexson, Gonzo, Webb, Johnson, etc. See what i mean? All divisions have great players.
05-06-2004, 04:15 PM
ucbearcat4ever Wrote:this division is alsso compettive, because the Champ haven't been determined until septemberNo division is decided before September.
05-06-2004, 04:15 PM
flyingswoosh Wrote:Yea, I agree. And those aren't even the good players in this division anymore. Mark Prior, Albert Pujols, Kerry Wood, and as you said Clemens are the class of players in this division now,ucbearcat4ever Wrote:IMO, The NL Central is the best division in MLB, because great players in Sosa, Clemens, Griffey, Pettite, and a few others, this division is alsso compettive, because the Champ haven't been determined until septemberthat's an awful way to determine a great division. Plus, Griffey is not a great player. The NL west is by no means the best division, but they have Bonds, Schmidt, Helton, Gagne, Sexson, Gonzo, Webb, Johnson, etc. See what i mean? All divisions have great players.
05-06-2004, 05:14 PM
flyingswoosh Wrote:if griffey is not a great player, then schmidt is not even a good playerucbearcat4ever Wrote:IMO, The NL Central is the best division in MLB, because great players in Sosa, Clemens, Griffey, Pettite, and a few others, this division is alsso compettive, because the Champ haven't been determined until septemberthat's an awful way to determine a great division. Plus, Griffey is not a great player. The NL west is by no means the best division, but they have Bonds, Schmidt, Helton, Gagne, Sexson, Gonzo, Webb, Johnson, etc. See what i mean? All divisions have great players.
05-06-2004, 05:43 PM
tysramm1 Wrote:Griffey has not been good in the past 4 yearsflyingswoosh Wrote:if griffey is not a great player, then schmidt is not even a good playerucbearcat4ever Wrote:IMO, The NL Central is the best division in MLB, because great players in Sosa, Clemens, Griffey, Pettite, and a few others, this division is alsso compettive, because the Champ haven't been determined until septemberthat's an awful way to determine a great division. Plus, Griffey is not a great player. The NL west is by no means the best division, but they have Bonds, Schmidt, Helton, Gagne, Sexson, Gonzo, Webb, Johnson, etc. See what i mean? All divisions have great players.
05-06-2004, 07:59 PM
Griffey's time came and went. He was an unbelievable player in the 90's, but since the turn of the century, he's been a big bust.
05-06-2004, 08:14 PM
griffey is still a star, and when healthy capable of greatness
05-06-2004, 09:45 PM
tysramm1 Wrote:griffey is still a star, and when healthy capable of greatnesswhat?!!! i'd expect that from someone who had a slave.
05-06-2004, 09:48 PM
Griffey is not a star. I would take Kearns over Griffey right now.
05-07-2004, 01:03 PM
tysramm, even when Griffey's been healthy this year he hasn't looked good. I think he's only hitting around .230.
05-07-2004, 02:36 PM
cbfranchise3 Wrote:Griffey is not a star. I would take Kearns over Griffey right now.Well Kearns is injured right now...So I would actually take Griffey
05-07-2004, 04:28 PM
UCBearcats1125 Wrote:When they are both healthy, I would take Kearns.cbfranchise3 Wrote:Griffey is not a star. I would take Kearns over Griffey right now.Well Kearns is injured right now...So I would actually take Griffey