I know for a fact that some women that used to lurk/post fairly often are now gone from this board because of some of the content here. Think about it guys, just for a second, from our perspective.....most of you have wives and/or daughters ? Why can't you take all that crap to the appropriate place (Babe of the Day?) Isn't this suppose to be a sports forum where we also share our life experiences ? I'm sorry but for us females that does NOT include bouncing boobs. Every now and then I had no complaints, personally, but I will admit that I agree it has finally gone too far. Some of you male types might just be glad to rid the board of the female perspective but I will say that it's a real shame because some of us females truly do love the tigers just as much if not more than some of you guys and actually have some knowledge to share on tiger sports. I understand where most of you are coming from, I truly do (I have 2 brothers) but come on....let's clean up our acts and make this a top-notch site again, ok ? If getting rid of my Bart is what I need to do to help this along the way I will gladly do it. This used to be one of the best sports forums on the net....lately I'm embarrassed to tell anyone about it

sorry for the rant........
MissJTiger, I have to say I agree.
Little by little things have spiraled downward and it is such a shame.
Its not just women who have left, its some of our good posters also.
Come on all.
Straighten up and lets "ALL" enjoy this great season!
missjtiger Wrote:I know for a fact that some women that used to lurk/post fairly often are now gone from this board because of some of the content here. Think about it guys, just for a second, from our perspective.....most of you have wives and/or daughters ? Why can't you take all that crap to the appropriate place (Babe of the Day?) Isn't this suppose to be a sports forum where we also share our life experiences ? I'm sorry but for us females that does NOT include bouncing boobs. Every now and then I had no complaints, personally, but I will admit that I agree it has finally gone too far. Some of you male types might just be glad to rid the board of the female perspective but I will say that it's a real shame because some of us females truly do love the tigers just as much if not more than some of you guys and actually have some knowledge to share on tiger sports. I understand where most of you are coming from, I truly do (I have 2 brothers) but come on....let's clean up our acts and make this a top-notch site again, ok ? If getting rid of my Bart is what I need to do to help this along the way I will gladly do it. This used to be one of the best sports forums on the net....lately I'm embarrassed to tell anyone about it
sorry for the rant........
I agree (although I do like the bouncing boobs) and would hate to lose all the varied perspectives that are represented on this board because of testosterone overload.
There are most definitely a lot of folks around here who are doing their part in killing this forum. I've been here for quite a few years myself, and it resembles something closer to a frat house than it ever has.
You're not only running off a lot of potential new members, but you're also running off quite a few of the long timers who used to be regulars on this forum.
But knowing the general consensus around here, the majority could probably care less.....so whatever...
HornLakeTiger Wrote:There are most definitely a lot of folks around here who are doing their part in killing this forum. I've been here for quite a few years myself, and it resembles something closer to a frat house than it ever has.
You're not only running off a lot of potential new members, but you're also running off quite a few of the long timers who used to be regulars on this forum.
But knowing the general consensus around here, the majority could probably care less.....so whatever...
Glass houses hlt!!!! You're signature picture is more offensive to me than the bouncing jugs! ;-)
missjtiger Wrote:I know for a fact that some women that used to lurk/post fairly often are now gone from this board because of some of the content here. Think about it guys, just for a second, from our perspective.....most of you have wives and/or daughters ? Why can't you take all that crap to the appropriate place (Babe of the Day?) Isn't this suppose to be a sports forum where we also share our life experiences ? I'm sorry but for us females that does NOT include bouncing boobs. Every now and then I had no complaints, personally, but I will admit that I agree it has finally gone too far. Some of you male types might just be glad to rid the board of the female perspective but I will say that it's a real shame because some of us females truly do love the tigers just as much if not more than some of you guys and actually have some knowledge to share on tiger sports. I understand where most of you are coming from, I truly do (I have 2 brothers) but come on....let's clean up our acts and make this a top-notch site again, ok ? If getting rid of my Bart is what I need to do to help this along the way I will gladly do it. This used to be one of the best sports forums on the net....lately I'm embarrassed to tell anyone about it
sorry for the rant........
great points and i agree.
however, fwiw, there have been a couple of times where my 4 year old has been looking at the screen over my shoulder while i was reading a thread that you posted in and asked me "why is that little boy pulling down his pants?"....
not really a big deal but somewhat topical to the point of your thread
some need to remember everyone has diff views and beliefs.
what may offend one may not another. i for one will not allow
myself to get upset or offended by what i see on here.
just take it for what it is, someone with a diff view and opinion
on life.
tigerloyal Wrote:MissJTiger, I have to say I agree.
Little by little things have spiraled downward and it is such a shame.
Its not just women who have left, its some of our good posters also.
Come on all.
Straighten up and lets "ALL" enjoy this great season!
I second that.
AMEN, missj! Couldn't have said it better myself!

memphomike Wrote:some need to remember everyone has diff views and beliefs.
what may offend one may not another. i for one will not allow
myself to get upset or offended by what i see on here.
just take it for what it is, someone with a diff view and opinion
on life.
There's also something called 'standards'. I agree with MissJ. If the community standard is going to permanently sink to the current level or lower, the exodus will continue. As much as it pains me, I'll join the caravan headed out. I have no problem with all of the differing viewpoints in this forum. However, when the language/photos/material is consistently viewed as offensive by a number of posters, shouldn't that raise a red flag?
I could do that by myself. Don't make me post a pic.
No wait the only picture I have is from Nightmarez Haunted House making a girl cry with a leafblower. oh well.

We seem to be more concerned with the improper advertisement of products that don't exist than actually moderating the board.
hey i have no problems with cleaning it up. the problem is its an
open forum on the internet. your opinion of right is diff than others.
what makes your opinion the right one. or mine for that matter.
its just a sticky line and someone is gonna get offended. thats
why some here need to get thicker skin.
I have a question and don't mean to show favor one way or the other but , since there is a site for the t&a, why do the moderators not just do like the do with subjects about politics and move questionable things immediatly?
As for the signatures that crossed the line, why are they not just stopped?
Isn't this what moderators are for?
Not being critical at all but why are our moderators allowing some things and not others?
Maybe, we need to discuss the rules and make them clearer.
I am beginning to get confused.
Well, actually I have been confused lmfao , but thats another subject.

I may be in the minority of males here, but I agree. I have no problem with the BOTD board - you know what you're going to get when you go there. Common sense on the main board would be appreciated.
My signature video has the name "Church" in it, it must be right.
UMTigerfan Wrote:missjtiger Wrote:I know for a fact that some women that used to lurk/post fairly often are now gone from this board because of some of the content here. Think about it guys, just for a second, from our perspective.....most of you have wives and/or daughters ? Why can't you take all that crap to the appropriate place (Babe of the Day?) Isn't this suppose to be a sports forum where we also share our life experiences ? I'm sorry but for us females that does NOT include bouncing boobs. Every now and then I had no complaints, personally, but I will admit that I agree it has finally gone too far. Some of you male types might just be glad to rid the board of the female perspective but I will say that it's a real shame because some of us females truly do love the tigers just as much if not more than some of you guys and actually have some knowledge to share on tiger sports. I understand where most of you are coming from, I truly do (I have 2 brothers) but come on....let's clean up our acts and make this a top-notch site again, ok ? If getting rid of my Bart is what I need to do to help this along the way I will gladly do it. This used to be one of the best sports forums on the net....lately I'm embarrassed to tell anyone about it
sorry for the rant........
great points and i agree.
however, fwiw, there have been a couple of times where my 4 year old has been looking at the screen over my shoulder while i was reading a thread that you posted in and asked me "why is that little boy pulling down his pants?"....
not really a big deal but somewhat topical to the point of your thread
and that is exactly why I said what I did about taking Bart down...if it is offensive to some then I will take him down. Just curious...with a 4 year old how did you answer his question ? I'll admit that I'm an old fart now and my days of watching cartoons with the kids are long behind me so I don't have a clue of what the little ones watch nowdays. I guess the reasoning behind Bart for me was because he's a cartoon character (he's been my sig for 7 years now) but I do understand your concern for this, I really do.
memphomike Wrote:hey i have no problems with cleaning it up. the problem is its an
open forum on the internet. your opinion of right is diff than others.
what makes your opinion the right one. or mine for that matter.
its just a sticky line and someone is gonna get offended. thats
why some here need to get thicker skin.
I don't think we're talking about opinions here.....it's pretty obvious what's acceptable for kids to view and what isn't. If it's questionable, leave it out.
Just my opinion.
HornLakeTiger Wrote:There are most definitely a lot of folks around here who are doing their part in killing this forum. I've been here for quite a few years myself, and it resembles something closer to a frat house than it ever has.
You're not only running off a lot of potential new members, but you're also running off quite a few of the long timers who used to be regulars on this forum.
But knowing the general consensus around here, the majority could probably care less.....so whatever...
Yea, I think it is the popular minority forcing there ideals on the majority. But hey, if homey's girl wants them gone, let'em be gone. Not like anyone can reasonably object. This is only an issue because a couple of people want to make it one. This site is not "going to hell in a hand basket" because pimp, fsquid, or anyone posts some bouncing girls. Well doesn't matter anyway, the censors usually get their way I guess.

HornLakeTiger Wrote:There are most definitely a lot of folks around here who are doing their part in killing this forum. I've been here for quite a few years myself, and it resembles something closer to a frat house than it ever has.
You're not only running off a lot of potential new members, but you're also running off quite a few of the long timers who used to be regulars on this forum.
But knowing the general consensus around here, the majority could probably care less.....so whatever...
Oh please! This place is about as sterile as it has ever been. I mean, there used to be all kinds of nasty animal sex photos posted and links to even worse. Does this offend some people, probably but part of the reason we ended up with our own board was so we could police it as we see fit. If you don't like someone's posts, use the filter. I used the filter for JT's moronic "Realdumb" posts for two years. Don't become the message board Taliban to censor content. Use the filter.
oldtiger Wrote:memphomike Wrote:hey i have no problems with cleaning it up. the problem is its an
open forum on the internet. your opinion of right is diff than others.
what makes your opinion the right one. or mine for that matter.
its just a sticky line and someone is gonna get offended. thats
why some here need to get thicker skin.
I don't think we're talking about opinions here.....it's pretty obvious what's acceptable for kids to view and what isn't. If it's questionable, leave it out.
Just my opinion.

i am all for it, you have never seen anything questionable from me.
just saying what is right for you isnt the same for everyone else.
this should be handled by the mods. if someone puts a pic up thats
questionable, take it down and let em know its not acceptable. simple
as that.
We tiger fans need an arch enemy like UAB, UofL or OlePiss. Without someone else to bash we would kill each other.
Good lord we couldn't agree on the color of

TigerEdward Wrote:HornLakeTiger Wrote:There are most definitely a lot of folks around here who are doing their part in killing this forum. I've been here for quite a few years myself, and it resembles something closer to a frat house than it ever has.
You're not only running off a lot of potential new members, but you're also running off quite a few of the long timers who used to be regulars on this forum.
But knowing the general consensus around here, the majority could probably care less.....so whatever...
Yea, I think it is the popular minority forcing there ideals on the majority. But hey, if homey's girl wants them gone, let'em be gone. Not like anyone can reasonably object. This is only an issue because a couple of people want to make it one. This site is not "going to hell in a hand basket" because pimp, fsquid, or anyone posts some bouncing girls. Well doesn't matter anyway, the censors usually get their way I guess. 
Not that I'm dying to jump into this frey, but I think there's a "silent" majority on this board that agree with MissJ than you think.
yeah we can its uab green
TIGER7880 Wrote:HornLakeTiger Wrote:There are most definitely a lot of folks around here who are doing their part in killing this forum. I've been here for quite a few years myself, and it resembles something closer to a frat house than it ever has.
You're not only running off a lot of potential new members, but you're also running off quite a few of the long timers who used to be regulars on this forum.
But knowing the general consensus around here, the majority could probably care less.....so whatever...
Oh please! This place is about as sterile as it has ever been. I mean, there used to be all kinds of nasty animal sex photos posted and links to even worse. Does this offend some people, probably but part of the reason we ended up with our own board was so we could police it as we see fit. If you don't like someone's posts, use the filter. I used the filter for JT's moronic "Realdumb" posts for two years. Don't become the message board Taliban to censor content. Use the filter.
Oh my goodness. A mature poster that makes perfect sense. Too bad that the real problem is a few that don't want to bother with the filter want to just force their views and ideas for "what is decent" on others. Man, there are some real hypocrites doing this. A few internet communist want to rule the roost for all, yea censorship at it's best.
Excellent post Tiger7880.

A more rigid stance of what is acceptable and what is not may be needed. And it's just not the bouncing boobs. However, that being said, how do we please eveyone? We can't. Some will see our stance as too rigid, and leave, some will see our stance as too lax, and leave.
I'm not saying what missj says is right, but I'm also not saying what missj says is wrong either.
What I do know is this, everyone here, visitors included, should do everything they can to make this board the best it can be.
Use common sense, if you had a child ask yourself these questions: Would you want your child to see certain images, if the answer is no, don't post them. If you wouldn't want your child to read certain statements or exclamations, don't make them. Pretty simple really. People need to police themselves first.
tigerloyal Wrote:I have a question and don't mean to show favor one way or the other but , since there is a site for the t&a, why do the moderators not just do like the do with subjects about politics and move questionable things immediatly?
As for the signatures that crossed the line, why are they not just stopped?
Isn't this what moderators are for?
Not being critical at all but why are our moderators allowing some things and not others?
Maybe, we need to discuss the rules and make them clearer.
I am beginning to get confused.
Well, actually I have been confused lmfao , but thats another subject. 
Loyal, the problem I see with this is that yes, that is their job BUT my heavens...lately they would be "BABYSITTING" non-stop 24-7 to keep it clean. To me, that's not fair to the mods. They do have families/jobs/lives. I'm still waiting on an answer to my question of why can't all the "questionable" stuff just be posted on the "Babes of the Day" forum ?
TIGER7880 Wrote:Oh please! This place is about as sterile as it has ever been. I mean, there used to be all kinds of nasty animal sex photos posted and links to even worse. Does this offend some people, probably but part of the reason we ended up with our own board was so we could police it as we see fit. If you don't like someone's posts, use the filter. I used the filter for JT's moronic "Realdumb" posts for two years. Don't become the message board Taliban to censor content. Use the filter.
Thank you.
there is also an option in your control panel to disable signatures. I used this option when I was in a cubical.
tigerloyal Wrote:I have a question and don't mean to show favor one way or the other but , since there is a site for the t&a, why do the moderators not just do like the do with subjects about politics and move questionable things immediatly?
As for the signatures that crossed the line, why are they not just stopped?
Isn't this what moderators are for?
Not being critical at all but why are our moderators allowing some things and not others?
Maybe, we need to discuss the rules and make them clearer.
I am beginning to get confused.
Well, actually I have been confused lmfao , but thats another subject. 
You would think so, but this new board software doesn't not allow mods to edit signatures and avatars like the old software did. Simply put, mods don't have the capability to do what you ask without taking the more extreme measure of either deleting the post or splitting the post off to the another board (not as easy as it sounds).
Sometimes we are restricted more by the software than we are by our morals.
I believe Admins do have this capability, but as missj said, we cannot expect SCC to be here 24/7.
I also believe some lines have been crossed in this area. Certain posters deliberately push the avator and signature envelope with their pics. They know EXACTLY what they are doing and enjoy doing it. Other posters cruise this board for the sole purpose of protesting or arguing over this dreaded censorship issue.
Controversy rules!
Since there seems to be minimal control, then I could use an avator that might be:
- considered racially inflammatory by some.
- absolutely gross, bloody, or revolting.
- deemed unduly or overtly sexist.
- crude or obscene.
Hey, I have first amendment rights, too. LOL!!
But I actually try to remember the theme of this message board. It is, first and foremost, a SPORTS MESSAGE BOARD. It is NOT a porn site, or a religious site, or a political site, or anything OTHER than a MEMPHIS TIGERS sports board.
So I try to stay within the theme of the board and not be borderline offensive to anyone. At least with my avator. LOL! I'm sure some of my posts have bothered some fellow posters.
But the bottom line is there IS a filter to remove signatures and avators while one persues this board.
My advice would be to use it 100% and just read the posts.
missjtiger Wrote:I know for a fact that some women that used to lurk/post fairly often are now gone from this board because of some of the content here. Think about it guys, just for a second, from our perspective.....most of you have wives and/or daughters ? Why can't you take all that crap to the appropriate place (Babe of the Day?) Isn't this suppose to be a sports forum where we also share our life experiences ? I'm sorry but for us females that does NOT include bouncing boobs. Every now and then I had no complaints, personally, but I will admit that I agree it has finally gone too far. Some of you male types might just be glad to rid the board of the female perspective but I will say that it's a real shame because some of us females truly do love the tigers just as much if not more than some of you guys and actually have some knowledge to share on tiger sports. I understand where most of you are coming from, I truly do (I have 2 brothers) but come on....let's clean up our acts and make this a top-notch site again, ok ? If getting rid of my Bart is what I need to do to help this along the way I will gladly do it. This used to be one of the best sports forums on the net....lately I'm embarrassed to tell anyone about it
sorry for the rant........
I whole-heartedly agree...let's keep this place clean and sports-related.

Derby Wrote:Use common sense, if you had a child ask yourself these questions: Would you want your child to see certain images, if the answer is no, don't post them. If you wouldn't want your child to read certain statements or exclamations, don't make them. Pretty simple really. People need to police themselves first.
What you are saying makes sense, Derby. But like any mixed group of individuals, not all of us have kids or even care what kids may think about what they say or put in there messages.
I think the best medicine for this problem is
peer pressure. If you don't like the sexist images or comments, don't be afraid to let the author know about it. Enlist others to do the same. Sooner or later they will either leave the board or change their ways. Of course, many will just relish in the fact they are getting under you skin, too!!
GermantownTiger Wrote:I whole-heartedly agree...let's keep this place clean and sports-related. 
Please define "clean"? For whatever definition you give, you will find a differing opinion.
People need to use common sense when posting images.
There is no question there is fault on this board...fault that needs to be directed at the right person, who should step up and take responsibility for allowing pics of obscene nature take over this board. If you follow the trail..it all leads to Dave Woloshin. It's his fault.
This is a tough issue.
We should be able to police ourselves. Having had the objections expressed is a good thing. People need to be reminded that the envelope has been pushed too far around here by some. We need to be reminded of the participation of the women in this forum and their concerns. Others have work and children issues.
I agree that the board will lose character if we try too hard to sterilize it. If you have work issues, it would make sense to turn off signatures. If you choose to post a pic, consider it carefully before you do. Let's try to keep it classy, and remember that there are women and children present.
griffin Wrote:There is no question there is fault on this board...fault that needs to be directed at the right person, who should step up and take responsibility for allowing pics of obscene nature take over this board. If you follow the trail..it all leads to Dave Woloshin. It's his fault.
figures...that bum. He's probably sitting on the 55 yard line laughing at all of us.
I always thought that if you didn't like something or someone you went to your control panel and blocked it. Whether a sig or a avatar or a member that bugs you, just put them on ignore. Personally, I think less people are leaving for the boob sigs than there are leaving for all the constant bible thumping "holy" attitudes about every petty subject that comes up. If you don't have the same opinion as the little clics here, then you are labeled a moron or worse.
Anyway, I'm still trying to get all this straight. So it's wrong to have a bouncing breasted FULLY CLOTHED woman in your sig but not a bart simpson pulling down his pants mooning us. I mean seriously people...WHO FREAKIN CARES!!! Use the ignore button. JMHO
I also forgot to mention that Joe Lee Dunn is without question at fault. Dave and JLD must take responsibility for this situation. They are both at fault.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with fsuids pic. The other one of the well endowed young lady probably crosses the line.
Saying the board is worse than it used to be is also a complete crock. It used to be no holds barred when it came to posting pics. Not only that but people would take people's personal pics and doctor them and then repost them. We all grew up and cut that out. The only thing I have seen on here in a while that was vulgar/questionable was supposedly by accident when the guy posted the pic of a parrot on a guy's dong. Now that was pretty bad. lol
SpiderMan79x Wrote:I always thought that if you didn't like something or someone you went to your control panel and blocked it. Whether a sig or a avatar or a member that bugs you, just put them on ignore. Personally, I think less people are leaving for the boob sigs than there are leaving for all the constant bible thumping "holy" attitudes about every petty subject that comes up. If you don't have the same opinion as the little clics here, then you are labeled a moron or worse.
Anyway, I'm still trying to get all this straight. So it's wrong to have a bouncing breasted FULLY CLOTHED woman in your sig but not a bart simpson pulling down his pants mooning us. I mean seriously people...WHO FREAKIN CARES!!! Use the ignore button. JMHO
I will take care of Bart....now are you straight ? Is it "wrong" to have a bouncing breasted FULLY CLOTHED woman in your sig ? no it isn't....some of you guys just don't get it do you ? Maybe time for this ole fart to move on to somewhere a little more my style. 7 long years and it's come to this...oh well...life goes on doesn't it. GO TIGERS !!!
If only JLD would go to a traditional four down lineman set we would not have this problem. Why or why, will he not.....
SpiderMan79x Wrote:I always thought that if you didn't like something or someone you went to your control panel and blocked it. Whether a sig or a avatar or a member that bugs you, just put them on ignore. Personally, I think less people are leaving for the boob sigs than there are leaving for all the constant bible thumping "holy" attitudes about every petty subject that comes up. If you don't have the same opinion as the little clics here, then you are labeled a moron or worse.
Anyway, I'm still trying to get all this straight. So it's wrong to have a bouncing breasted FULLY CLOTHED woman in your sig but not a bart simpson pulling down his pants mooning us. I mean seriously people...WHO FREAKIN CARES!!! Use the ignore button. JMHO
I wondered when that would come up.
Let me say this, I will ask for prayer for anyone I feel the need to.
I guess it offends you for Coach Cal to ask for prayer for those of our Tiger family who are ill.
This is getting silly now but take this as fair warning, I may occasionally ask for prayer. If your offended by that, block me now.
Please, BLOCK ME NOW!
tigertommy Wrote:There is absolutely nothing wrong with fsuids pic. The other one of the well endowed young lady probably crosses the line.
Saying the board is worse than it used to be is also a complete crock. It used to be no holds barred when it came to posting pics. Not only that but people would take people's personal pics and doctor them and then repost them. We all grew up and cut that out. The only thing I have seen on here in a while that was vulgar/questionable was supposedly by accident when the guy posted the pic of a parrot on a guy's dong. Now that was pretty bad. lol
i had almost forgotten about the absolute war that ensued over the picture of jt's wife running with the olympic torch and a few other pictures during that time period. wow...those were the days.
missjtiger Wrote:I will take care of Bart....now are you straight ? Is it "wrong" to have a bouncing breasted FULLY CLOTHED woman in your sig ? no it isn't....some of you guys just don't get it do you ? Maybe time for this ole fart to move on to somewhere a little more my style. 7 long years and it's come to this...oh well...life goes on doesn't it. GO TIGERS !!!
We need you around here missj! Please don't give up on this site that you have contributed to for so long. The issue has been raised and I belive that you will see a more thoughtful approach to what people post (for awhile). Please don't overreact, give it some time. I'd like to see you keep Bart, but if you must change him then maybe you can use a pic of his face instead of his moon.
BRING BACK BART!
missjtiger Wrote:SpiderMan79x Wrote:I always thought that if you didn't like something or someone you went to your control panel and blocked it. Whether a sig or a avatar or a member that bugs you, just put them on ignore. Personally, I think less people are leaving for the boob sigs than there are leaving for all the constant bible thumping "holy" attitudes about every petty subject that comes up. If you don't have the same opinion as the little clics here, then you are labeled a moron or worse.
Anyway, I'm still trying to get all this straight. So it's wrong to have a bouncing breasted FULLY CLOTHED woman in your sig but not a bart simpson pulling down his pants mooning us. I mean seriously people...WHO FREAKIN CARES!!! Use the ignore button. JMHO
I will take care of Bart....now are you straight ? Is it "wrong" to have a bouncing breasted FULLY CLOTHED woman in your sig ? no it isn't....some of you guys just don't get it do you ? Maybe time for this ole fart to move on to somewhere a little more my style. 7 long years and it's come to this...oh well...life goes on doesn't it. GO TIGERS !!!
No taking down Bart is not enough. You just don't get it. The point was were does it stop. USE THE TOOLS GIVEN TO IGNORE IF YOU ARE OFFENDED. That doesn't stop you from communicating on the board. I thought this board was fun and as someone else said has a lot of character. Get a couple of holy rollers on a crusade to try and educate the populous on what is right and wrong and we end up all being right and all being wrong. The truth is in the eyes of the beholder. There is no truth in censorship!!

tigerloyal Wrote:SpiderMan79x Wrote:I always thought that if you didn't like something or someone you went to your control panel and blocked it. Whether a sig or a avatar or a member that bugs you, just put them on ignore. Personally, I think less people are leaving for the boob sigs than there are leaving for all the constant bible thumping "holy" attitudes about every petty subject that comes up. If you don't have the same opinion as the little clics here, then you are labeled a moron or worse.
Anyway, I'm still trying to get all this straight. So it's wrong to have a bouncing breasted FULLY CLOTHED woman in your sig but not a bart simpson pulling down his pants mooning us. I mean seriously people...WHO FREAKIN CARES!!! Use the ignore button. JMHO
I wondered when that would come up.
Let me say this, I will ask for prayer for anyone I feel the need to.
I guess it offends you for Coach Cal to ask for prayer for those of our Tiger family who are ill.
This is getting silly now but take this as fair warning, I may occasionally ask for prayer. If your offended by that, block me now.
Please, BLOCK ME NOW!
I am enjoying the sidelines for this debate but I must point out that folks could just as easily say I am going to have this picture in my sig and if you do not like it block me now. It is an interesting debate you guys are having. I will go back to my corner now since for once (it seems) I am not involved

The difference is , once told it offended and was not taken as funny, it ended, even thought it was funny to some.
Big difference there.
SigEpMike Wrote:tigertommy Wrote:There is absolutely nothing wrong with fsuids pic. The other one of the well endowed young lady probably crosses the line.
Saying the board is worse than it used to be is also a complete crock. It used to be no holds barred when it came to posting pics. Not only that but people would take people's personal pics and doctor them and then repost them. We all grew up and cut that out. The only thing I have seen on here in a while that was vulgar/questionable was supposedly by accident when the guy posted the pic of a parrot on a guy's dong. Now that was pretty bad. lol
i had almost forgotten about the absolute war that ensued over the picture of jt's wife running with the olympic torch and a few other pictures during that time period. wow...those were the days.
It wasn't even that one that exploded the whole thing. It was one with JT as a member of the village People on the cover of Rolling Stone. Just being linked to those pillow biters wreaked all kinds of havoc. lol